From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grenadier v. McCabe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 2, 2024
No. 23-1447 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

23-1447

02-02-2024

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW MCCABE; WILLIAM PELHAM. BARR; JAMES BRIEN COMEY, JR., Defendants-Appellees.

Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: January 30, 2024

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00016-NKM-JCH)

Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se.

BEFORE KING, AGEE, AND THACKER, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Grenadier v. McCabe, No. 3:22-cv-00016-NKM-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 17, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Grenadier v. McCabe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 2, 2024
No. 23-1447 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Grenadier v. McCabe

Case Details

Full title:JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW MCCABE; WILLIAM…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

No. 23-1447 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2024)