From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Albany Yellow Cab Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 20, 1936
249 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 20, 1936.

Appeal from Albany County Court.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


An automobile in which plaintiff was riding and a taxicab owned and operated by the defendant came into collision at a street intersection in the city of Albany and as the result the plaintiff was injured. Upon the trial the defendant offered as witnesses two passengers who were riding in the taxicab at the time of the accident and showed upon direct examination that each of these passengers had been settled with by the defendant for the injuries which they sustained in the accident and that they had given releases therefor. Upon cross-examination the plaintiff brought out over the objection of the defendant the amounts paid by the defendant on these settlements. This evidence was properly received as bearing upon the credibility of the witnesses. ( Keet v. Murrin, 235 App. Div. 882; affd., 260 N.Y. 586.) Upon the summation plaintiff's counsel referred to the payment by the defendant to its passengers, inferring that such payments were admissions of liability upon the part of the defendant. This reference by counsel was improper and is to be condemned, but in view of the strength of the testimony in the case as to the defendant's negligence, may be disregarded. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Albany Yellow Cab Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 20, 1936
249 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Albany Yellow Cab Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IRVING GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. ALBANY YELLOW CAB CO., INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Cavalier v. Bittner

Where the question is close this element is apparently the deciding factor. Later, in 1936, the Third…

Mannion v. General Baking Company

The resolution of the main issue of the case depended largely, if not entirely, upon consideration of oral…