May, 1932.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except McNamee, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the admission of the evidence that the defendant "settled" with a witness, who had a corresponding claim against the defendant, was erroneous and prejudicial.
Full title:EUGENE KEET, Respondent, v. HOWARD MURRIN, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: May 1, 1932
It has been held that a witness who was injured in the same accident as the one in litigation on trial may be…
Schenker v. Bourne( Cochrane v. Fahey, 245 App. Div. 41; Baesens v. New York Central R.R. Co., 201 App. Div. 191; Woodland v.…