From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giannone v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1987
127 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Summary

holding that where an action was commenced less than 60 days after a notice of claim was served on the Port Authority, the action must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Kyne v. Carl Beiber Bus Services

Opinion

February 23, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pino, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed on the law, with costs, the plaintiff's motion is denied, the defendant's cross motion is granted, and the action is dismissed.

In this action by the plaintiff against the defendant Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, he seeks to recover damages for injuries he allegedly suffered on September 5, 1983, when he fell from a ladder on the defendant's premises. It is undisputed that a notice of claim was served on the defendant on October 11, 1983, and less than 60 days later, on November 22, 1983, this action was commenced by service of a summons and complaint.

The defendant, as an agency of the State of New York, enjoyed the same sovereign immunity as the State of New York when first created (Trippe v. Port of N.Y. Auth., 14 N.Y.2d 119). By statute, however, the Legislature has consented to waive sovereign immunity and permit suits against the defendant (McKinney's Uncons Laws of N.Y. § 7101; L 1950, ch 301, § 1). That waiver of immunity and consent to suits against the defendant, however, is predicated upon compliance with certain conditions. One of those conditions as set forth in McKinney's Unconsolidated Laws of N.Y. § 7107 (L 1950, ch 301, § 7), is that "a notice of claim shall have been served upon the port authority by or on behalf of the plaintiff or plaintiffs at least sixty days before such suit, action or proceeding is commenced".

Compliance with this condition is mandatory and jurisdictional and the failure to satisfy this condition results in a withdrawal of consent and compels the dismissal of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (see, Luciano v. Fanberg Realty Co., 102 A.D.2d 94). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Giannone v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1987
127 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

holding that where an action was commenced less than 60 days after a notice of claim was served on the Port Authority, the action must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Kyne v. Carl Beiber Bus Services
Case details for

Giannone v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GIANNONE, Respondent, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1987

Citations

127 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Kyne v. Carl Beiber Bus Services

The failure to satisfy this condition will result in withdrawal of defendant's consent to suit and compels…

Tutor Perini Bldg. Corp. v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. (In re George Wash. bridge Bus Station Dev. Venture)

Laws enacted by the New York and New Jersey legislatures waived sovereign immunity to permit suits against…