From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 7, 1995
652 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-640.

April 7, 1995.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; R. Michael Hutcheson, Judge.

John D. Gentry, Madison, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


The summary denial of Gentry's 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Gentry alleges illegal consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). The correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. Bunch v. State, 647 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (question certified), review granted, (Fla. Feb. 15, 1995); Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gentry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 7, 1995
652 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Gentry v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. GENTRY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 7, 1995

Citations

652 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Gentry v. State

This court affirmed on the basis that a Rule 3.800(a) proceeding was not the proper remedy in which to raise…