From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 13, 1995
647 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2461.

January 13, 1995.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County; Richard G. Weinberg, Judge.

Steve Ray Bunch, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


AFFIRMED. We affirm the summary denial of Bunch's 3.800(a) motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice. Although Bunch has demonstrated a prima facie case of improper consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), the correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. See Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Borders v. State, 643 So.2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

DAUKSCH, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bunch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 13, 1995
647 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Bunch v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVE RAY BUNCH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 13, 1995

Citations

647 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Gentry v. State

The correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. Bunch v. State, 647 So.2d 1080 (Fla.…