From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. N.Y.S. Office of Children & Family Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2022
203 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

15485 Index No. 153172/20 Case No. 2021–00799

03-10-2022

In the Matter of Ivelisse GARCIA, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Respondent.

Law Office of Roland R. Acevedo, New York (Roland R. Acevedo of counsel), for petitioner. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Eric R. Haren of counsel), for respondent.


Law Office of Roland R. Acevedo, New York (Roland R. Acevedo of counsel), for petitioner.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Eric R. Haren of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gonza´lez, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.

Determination of respondent, dated January 22, 2020, which, after a hearing, sustained the determination that the subject child was not to be returned to petitioner's home, and that the determination to remove the child was correct, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Eileen A. Rakower, J.], entered October 8, 2020), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports respondent's conclusion that there was a strong basis to believe that petitioner would not take appropriate steps to protect the child's future health and wellbeing, and removal of the child from petitioner's care was not irrational (see generally Matter of Urena v. Wing, 260 A.D.2d 158, 159, 687 N.Y.S.2d 365 [1st Dept. 1999] ).


Summaries of

Garcia v. N.Y.S. Office of Children & Family Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2022
203 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. N.Y.S. Office of Children & Family Servs.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Ivelisse GARCIA, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 10, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
203 A.D.3d 488

Citing Cases

Robbins v. 315 W. 103 Enters. LLC

Ct., N.Y. County 2020] [311 calls complained about "failure to receive demolition notice, unsafe crane…

Khozissova v. Rah Lauren Corp.

" (Gottwald v Sebert, 203 A.D.3d 488, 489 [1st Dept 2022].) The Anti-SLAPP amendment is very clearly not…