From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Chun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 14, 1992
179 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 14, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.).


Although defendant was temporarily residing in Queens County when the action was commenced, the IAS court properly retained venue in Bronx County, where the cause of action arose and all nonparty material liability witnesses reside. Although it is proper to bring suit in a county where one of the parties resides, upon a proper showing a transitory action may also be tried in the county where the cause of action arose when such promotes the convenience of witnesses (McKinney Son v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, 84 A.D.2d 635; compare, Green v Shortts, 145 A.D.2d 340). Plaintiff having made the necessary showing, the IAS court properly exercised its discretion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Chun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 14, 1992
179 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Freeman v. Chun

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONZO FREEMAN, Respondent, v. SUK HO CHUN et al., Appellants. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
577 N.Y.S.2d 858

Citing Cases

Wickman v. Pyramid Crossgates Co.

However, the situs of plaintiff's injury provides a basis for a discretionary change of venue to Albany…

Oquendo v. Nationwide Insurance Co.

Changing venue from Bronx County to Onondaga County was an improvident exercise of the motion court's…