Fogelson v. Barst Mukamal

Full title: JEFFREY P. FOGELSON, Respondent, v. BARST MUKAMAL et al., Appellants

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1993

192 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

595 N.Y.S.2d 450

Opinion

April 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).

The IAS Court has the discretion to excuse compliance with the ten-day limit of CPLR 3122 (see, Matter of Handel v Handel, 26 N.Y.2d 853), and there was here no abuse of that discretion. Defendants did not make the required showing that the tax returns contain necessary information that could not be obtained elsewhere (see, Gordon v Grossman, 183 A.D.2d 669 ).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.