From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 25, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-25

In the Matter of Jose FERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Jose Fernandez, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Jose Fernandez, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

While petitioner was being examined by a physician's assistant at the correctional facility where he was incarcerated, she observed him staring at her breasts. She twice instructed him to stop engaging in such conduct, but he refused. She then directed him to leave the room and he complied. As a result of this incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with harassment and refusing a direct order. He was found guilty of the charges at the conclusion of a tier II hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of White v. Fischer, 95 A.D.3d 1582, 1583, 943 N.Y.S.2d 924 [2012];Matter of Johnson v. Rock, 64 A.D.3d 1096, 1096, 882 N.Y.S.2d 667 [2009],lv. denied13 N.Y.3d 713, 893 N.Y.S.2d 842, 921 N.E.2d 610 [2009] ). Petitioner's denial of any misconduct and claim that he is Spanish speaking and did not understand the assistant's directives presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Mungo v. Director of Special Hous. & Inmate Disciplinary Programs, 93 A.D.3d 1057, 1058, 940 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2012],appeal dismissed19 N.Y.3d 919, 950 N.Y.S.2d 87, 973 N.E.2d 183 [2012];Matter of Garcia v. Bertone, 91 A.D.3d 1217, 1218, 936 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2012] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have either not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

LAHTINEN, J.P., SPAIN, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fernandez v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 25, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Fernandez v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jose FERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
963 N.Y.S.2d 608
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2799

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Fischer

The misbehavior report, hearing testimony, supporting documentation, including positive drug tests, and…

Madden v. Griffin

Initially, respondents concede and we agree that substantial evidence does not support that part of the…