From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feinstein v. Merdinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2003
305 A.D.2d 115 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2789N

May 1, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered May 31, 2001, which, in a proceeding seeking modification of the child support, maintenance and custody provisions contained in the parties' judgment of divorce, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, directed respondent ex-husband to pay petitioner ex-wife's attorney interim counsel fees of $15,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Itamar J. Yeger, for peitioner-respondent.

William S. Hochenberg, for respondent-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias, JJ.


The motion court properly awarded petitioner counsel fees to defend against respondent's cross motion for a change in custody (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]). Petitioner's submission of a net worth statement in her reply papers, rather than in her moving papers as required by 22 NYCRR 202.16(k)(2), did not warrant denial of her request for such fees, where the effect of the net worth statement was to confirm a prior recently filed net worth statement prepared for purposes of this proceeding. Indeed, respondent does not argue that the fee award is based on misrepresented or mistaken financial facts, but rather that a previous payment he made was enough to cover petitioner's legal expenses. Attorneys' fees, however, can be awarded for prospective work ( see Avedon v. Avedon, 270 A.D.2d 65, 66, lv dismissed 95 N.Y.2d 902).

The Decision and Order of this Court entered herein on January 14, 2003 is hereby recalled and vacated.

See Motions M-803 and M-876 decided simultaneously herewith.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Feinstein v. Merdinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2003
305 A.D.2d 115 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Feinstein v. Merdinger

Case Details

Full title:RANDE SUE FEINSTEIN, Peitioner-Respondent, v. STEVEN M. MERDINGER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 115 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 491

Citing Cases

Warshaw v. Warshaw

Reasonable short-term prospective counsel fees are appropriate under all of the circumstances discussed…

Tomassetti v. Tomassetti

Contrary to the defendant's contention, under the circumstances presented (see Tomassetti v. Tomassetti, –––…