From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Favors v. Jesson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 12, 2015
Civil No. 14-3473 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Aug. 12, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-3473 (JRT/LIB)

08-12-2015

JOSEPH ANTHONY FAVORS, Plaintiff, v. LUCINDA JESSON, Respondent.

Joseph Anthony Favors, 79327, MSOP, 1111 Highway 73, Moose Lake, MN 55767, pro se plaintiff, Matthew Frank, James Early, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1800, St Paul, MN 55101-2134, Donald E. Bruce, DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033, for defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Joseph Anthony Favors, 79327, MSOP, 1111 Highway 73, Moose Lake, MN 55767, pro se plaintiff, Matthew Frank, James Early, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1800, St Paul, MN 55101-2134, Donald E. Bruce, DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033, for defendant.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, [Docket No. 1], is DENIED with prejudice

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: August 12, 2015
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Favors v. Jesson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 12, 2015
Civil No. 14-3473 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Aug. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Favors v. Jesson

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ANTHONY FAVORS, Plaintiff, v. LUCINDA JESSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Aug 12, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 14-3473 (JRT/LIB) (D. Minn. Aug. 12, 2015)

Citing Cases

Rowland v. Forensic Mental Health Program (FMHP)

Even if timeliness was not an issue, Rowland cannot claim ineffective assistance of counsel as a basis for…

Opiacha v. Dep't of Human Servs.

Federal habeas corpus review is available to challenge state-court orders placing someone into civil…