Opinion
February 20, 2009.
Parties Necessary Parties. Mortgages — Foreclosure — Vacatur of Judgment.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
E*TRADE Bank v. Perez
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Queens County
Feb 20, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1127 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)
Summaries of
E*TRADE Bank v. Perez
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Queens County
Feb 20, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1127 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)
Case details for
E*TRADE Bank v. Perez
Case Details
Full title:E*Trade Bank v. Perez
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Queens County
Date published: Feb 20, 2009
Citations
22 Misc. 3d 1127 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50314
Citing Cases
HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA) v. Carr
atutory requirement of a written request for a satisfaction of mortgage” ( HSBC Bank, USA v. Pugkhem, 88…
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. HolohanThe facts show that there was no compliance with the Payoff Letter, since the Holohans, after its receipt,…