From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ericksen v. Booth

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jul 7, 2009
Civil Action No. 2:08cv104 (N.D.W. Va. Jul. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:08cv104.

July 7, 2009


ORDER


It will be recalled that on May 5, 2009, Magistrate Judge David J. Joel filed his Report and Recommendation, wherein the Plaintiff was directed, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), to file with the Clerk of Court any written objections within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed his objections on May 20, 2009.

Upon examination of the report from the Magistrate Judge, it appears to the Court that the issues raised by the Plaintiff in his Complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, wherein Plaintiff challenges the classification and program recommendation that he attend sex offender treatment, were thoroughly considered by Magistrate Judge Joel in his Report and Recommendation. Upon review of the Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds that the Plaintiff has not raised any issues that were not already throughly considered and addressed by the Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendation. Moreover, the Court, upon an independent de novo consideration of all matters now before it, is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation accurately reflects the law applicable to the facts and circumstances before the Court in this action. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Joel's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, accepted in whole and that this civil action be disposed of in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #14) shall be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (docket #27) shall be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiff civil rights complaint be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice and that this civil action be STRICKEN from the docket of the Court. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment for the Defendants. It is further

ORDERED that, if Plaintiff should desire to appeal the decision of this Court, written notice of appeal must be received by the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the Judgment Order, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The $5.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal and the $450.00 docketing fee should also be submitted with the notice of appeal. In the alternative, at the time the notice of appeal is submitted, Plaintiff may, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to transmit a copy of this Order to all parties appearing herein.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Ericksen v. Booth

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jul 7, 2009
Civil Action No. 2:08cv104 (N.D.W. Va. Jul. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Ericksen v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:GRANT EUGENE ERICKSEN, Plaintiff, v. ANGIE BOOTH, DEBRA COTTRELL, TERESA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Jul 7, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:08cv104 (N.D.W. Va. Jul. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Mercer v. Sullivan

Additionally, the Amended Complaint lacks facts suggesting the participation in the PBSOTP involved atypical…

Ericksen v. Booth

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…