From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ericksen v. Booth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 2, 2009
355 F. App'x 678 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-7345.

Submitted: November 5, 2009.

Decided: December 2, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00104-REM-DJJ).

Grant Eugene Ericksen, Appellant Pro Se. John Herbert Boothroyd, West Virginia Division of Corrections, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Grant Eugene Ericksen appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ericksen v. Booth, No. 2:08-cv-00104-REM-DJJ, 2009 WL 1974195 (N.D.W.Va. July 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ericksen v. Booth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 2, 2009
355 F. App'x 678 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Ericksen v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:Grant Eugene ERICKSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angie BOOTH; Debra…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 2, 2009

Citations

355 F. App'x 678 (4th Cir. 2009)