Opinion
March 19, 1941.
Appeal from Supreme Court, Madison County.
Present — Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.
Appellant contends that there was no power in the Special Term to reduce the alimony which had accrued under the judgment of divorce. This court held to the contrary in Van Dusen v. Van Dusen ( 258 App. Div. 1020). It was also contended that the reduction of the future monthly installments of alimony from twenty dollars to fifteen dollars was an abuse of discretion. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.