From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisinger v. Eisinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 1941
261 App. Div. 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

March 19, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Madison County.

Present — Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


Appellant contends that there was no power in the Special Term to reduce the alimony which had accrued under the judgment of divorce. This court held to the contrary in Van Dusen v. Van Dusen ( 258 App. Div. 1020). It was also contended that the reduction of the future monthly installments of alimony from twenty dollars to fifteen dollars was an abuse of discretion. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Eisinger v. Eisinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 19, 1941
261 App. Div. 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Eisinger v. Eisinger

Case Details

Full title:BERNICE H. EISINGER, Appellant, v. FRANCIS H. EISINGER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Snow v. Snow

However, it was not necessary to make provision with respect to that in the section in order to assure such…

Allingham v. Allingham

"* * * Under the local practice, alimony which has accrued under a decree of divorce may not be collected by…