From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dusen v. Dusen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 24, 1940
258 App. Div. 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

January 24, 1940.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The appellant was the plaintiff in an action for a separation, in which alimony was awarded by the final judgment. When by the terms of the judgment $1,500 had accrued due and was unpaid she moved for an order directing the Delaware county clerk to enter and docket a money judgment in her favor against defendant-respondent for $1,500. The court reduced the alimony nunc pro tunc and directed the entry of a judgment for $350, payable in installments. The court had authority under section 1170 of the Civil Practice Act to so modify the final judgment as to alimony past due or thereafter to become due. ( Fox v. Fox, 263 N.Y. 68; Kirkbride v. Van Note, 275 id. 244; Karlin v. Karlin, 280 id. 32.) Order unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

Dusen v. Dusen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 24, 1940
258 App. Div. 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Dusen v. Dusen

Case Details

Full title:OLIVE B. VAN DUSEN, Appellant, v. FRANCIS WARD VAN DUSEN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1940

Citations

258 App. Div. 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Snow v. Snow

However, it was not necessary to make provision with respect to that in the section in order to assure such…

Shanahan v. Shanahan

Defendant also requests that the court consider, after redetermination of alimony, whether all or part of the…