From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dula v. Fehr

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Dec 1, 1999
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion


744 So.2d 604 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1999) 24 Fla. L. Weekly D 2677 FRED P. DULA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. JEFFREY FEHR and STEVE T. KENNEDY, individually, and d/b/a ALL COUNTY APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 99-01149 Florida Court of Appeals, Second District. December 1, 1999

               Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; W. Wayne Woodard, Acting Circuit Judge.         Steven L. Brannock and Elizabeth A. DeConti of Hollands&sKnight LLP, Tampa, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.         W. Cort Frohlich of Wilkins, Frohlich, Jones, Hevia, Russells&s Sutter, P.A., Port Charlotte, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.         PER CURIAM.         Affirmed.         WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.         ALTENBERND, J., Dissents with .         ALTENBERND, Judge, Dissenting.         This court's decision to affirm the summary judgment in favor of these defendants is almost certainly an accurate prediction of the result that would occur if we reversed for further proceedings. Nevertheless, I believe the law requires that we reverse this summary judgment.         Fred P. Dula purchased two lots in Punta Gorda Isles in January 1989 from Rs&sL Development, Inc. (Rs&sL). The lots were purchased as an investment. Mr. Dula alleges that representatives of Rs&sL


Dula v. Leeber,





Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Snyder v. Cheezem Dev. Corp., Lich v. N.C.J. Inv. Co.,



Summaries of

Dula v. Fehr

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Dec 1, 1999
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Dula v. Fehr

Case Details

Full title:FRED P. DULA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. JEFFREY FEHR and STEVE T…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Second District

Date published: Dec 1, 1999

Citations

24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2677

Citing Cases

Warfield v. Stewart

The statute of limitations for fraud begins to run when the fraud was discovered or should have been…