commenting that this court has "never held . . . that failure to give a specific alibi instruction is necessarily a constitutional violation. Nor has any other circuit."
Summary of this case from Bartlett v. JaneckaNo. 95-7812.
April 22, 1996, October TERM, 1995.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 F. 3d 734.
commenting that this court has "never held . . . that failure to give a specific alibi instruction is necessarily a constitutional violation. Nor has any other circuit."
Summary of this case from Bartlett v. Janeckacommenting that this court has "never held . . . that failure to give a specific alibi instruction is necessarily a constitutional violation. Nor has any other circuit."
Summary of this case from Parreno v. AnnettsFull title:DUCKETT v. GODINEZ, WARDEN, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 22, 1996
Following Baby Boy L., the EIF exception gained some acceptance in other state appellate courts that…
Zeigler v. FoxThe Constitution does not guarantee a defendant the right to jury instructions phrased in the precise terms…