From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downes v. American Monument Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 2001
283 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 15, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered March 11, 1999, which, in an action by a grave digger for personal injuries sustained when a gravestone installed by defendant-appellant fell on him, insofar as appealed from, denied appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Herald Price Fahringer, for plaintiff-respondent.

Daniel A. Seymour, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


The motion court properly considered the affidavit of plaintiff's expert witness in opposition to summary judgment, notwithstanding plaintiff's failure to disclose the expert's identity previously pursuant to CPLR 3101(d)(1)(I), there being no showing of willfulness in or prejudice caused by the failure to disclose earlier (see, McDermott v. Alvey, Inc., 198 A.D.2d 95). Upon consideration of that affidavit, issues of fact exist as to whether the method appellant used to attach the gravestone to its base was negligent, and, if so, whether plaintiff's injuries were caused thereby.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Downes v. American Monument Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 2001
283 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Downes v. American Monument Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DOWNES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AMERICAN MONUMENT CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 15, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 610

Citing Cases

Tardi v. Casler-Bladek

As preclusion is a draconian measure (see Mead v Dr. Rajadhyax' Dental Group, 34 A.D.3d 1139, 1141 [3d Dept…

Schiff v. ABI One LLC

In reply, plaintiff contends that West's affidavit is admissible in the absence of prejudice or wilfulness.…