Summary
holding that the devices described in the Act generally refer to contrivances on which a workman is dependent for support
Summary of this case from Seeden v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictOpinion
1984.
(60173) Blaszczak v. City of Palos Hills ........................ Denied.
(60483) Bloomfield v. Bloomfield ................................ Denied.
(60304) Brand v. Brand .......................................... Denied.
(60440) Brannen v. Reid, Ochsenschlager, Murphy Hupp (Moran, J., took no part.) ............................ Denied.
(60515) Braun v. Retirement Board ............................... Allowed.
(60091) Brown v. Brown .......................................... Denied.
(60169) Brown v. G M Distributors, Inc. ....................... Denied.
(60358) Bruno Benedetti Sons, Inc. v. O'Malley ................ Denied.
(60457) Burke v. Tokoph ......................................... Denied.
(60346) Byers v. Kato ........................................... Denied.
(60177) Canton State Bank v. Human Rights Com. .................. Denied.
(60632) Carlson v. Moline Board of Education .................... Denied.
(60486) Carwile v. Merchant ..................................... Denied.
(60589) Ceco Corp. v. Bank of Hickory Hills ..................... Denied.
(60494) Chambers v. Chambers .................................... Denied.
(60561) Champaign National Bank v. Illinois Power Co.
(Underwood, J., took no part.) ........................ Denied.
(60293) Chicago, City of v. Pudlo ............................... Denied.
(60362) Chicago Transit Authority v. Yellow Cab Co.
(Clark, J., took no part.) ............................ Denied.
(60363) Claro v. Gillespie Community Unit School District No. 7 ................................. Denied.
(60272) Clifford-Jacobs Forgin Co. v. Capital Engineering Manufacturing Co. ....................... Denied.
(60565) Collins v. Interroyal Corp. ............................. Denied.
(60217) Cook, County of v. Department of Labor .................. Denied.
(60547) Cooper v. Portell ....................................... Denied.
(60083) Cooper v. United Development Co. ........................ Denied.
(60633) Corcoran v. International Harvester Co. ................. Denied.
(60079) Cornes v. Groves ........................................ Denied.
(60122) Creighton Leiter Realty Co. v. Watkins .................. Denied.
(60314) Criel v. Palmer ......................................... Denied.
(60638) Czerwonka v. Mattes ..................................... Denied.
(60550) Davis v. Freeman ........................................ Allowed.
(60523, 60541) Decker Truck Lines v. Consolidated Rail Corp. ............................................ Denied.
(60345) Del Muro v. Commonwealth Edison Co. ..................... Dismissed.
(60298) Department of Revenue v. Hartigan's Finer Foods, Inc. ..................................... Allowed.