From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1984
101 Ill. 2d 563 (Ill. 1984)

Summary

holding that the devices described in the Act generally refer to contrivances on which a workman is dependent for support

Summary of this case from Seeden v. Metropolitan Sanitary District

Opinion

1984.


(60173) Blaszczak v. City of Palos Hills ........................ Denied.

(60483) Bloomfield v. Bloomfield ................................ Denied.

(60304) Brand v. Brand .......................................... Denied.

(60440) Brannen v. Reid, Ochsenschlager, Murphy Hupp (Moran, J., took no part.) ............................ Denied.

(60515) Braun v. Retirement Board ............................... Allowed.

(60091) Brown v. Brown .......................................... Denied.

(60169) Brown v. G M Distributors, Inc. ....................... Denied.

(60358) Bruno Benedetti Sons, Inc. v. O'Malley ................ Denied.

(60457) Burke v. Tokoph ......................................... Denied.

(60346) Byers v. Kato ........................................... Denied.

(60177) Canton State Bank v. Human Rights Com. .................. Denied.

(60632) Carlson v. Moline Board of Education .................... Denied.

(60486) Carwile v. Merchant ..................................... Denied.

(60589) Ceco Corp. v. Bank of Hickory Hills ..................... Denied.

(60494) Chambers v. Chambers .................................... Denied.

(60561) Champaign National Bank v. Illinois Power Co.

(Underwood, J., took no part.) ........................ Denied.

(60293) Chicago, City of v. Pudlo ............................... Denied.

(60362) Chicago Transit Authority v. Yellow Cab Co.

(Clark, J., took no part.) ............................ Denied.

(60363) Claro v. Gillespie Community Unit School District No. 7 ................................. Denied.

(60272) Clifford-Jacobs Forgin Co. v. Capital Engineering Manufacturing Co. ....................... Denied.

(60565) Collins v. Interroyal Corp. ............................. Denied.

(60217) Cook, County of v. Department of Labor .................. Denied.

(60547) Cooper v. Portell ....................................... Denied.

(60083) Cooper v. United Development Co. ........................ Denied.

(60633) Corcoran v. International Harvester Co. ................. Denied.

(60079) Cornes v. Groves ........................................ Denied.

(60122) Creighton Leiter Realty Co. v. Watkins .................. Denied.

(60314) Criel v. Palmer ......................................... Denied.

(60638) Czerwonka v. Mattes ..................................... Denied.

(60550) Davis v. Freeman ........................................ Allowed.

(60523, 60541) Decker Truck Lines v. Consolidated Rail Corp. ............................................ Denied.

(60345) Del Muro v. Commonwealth Edison Co. ..................... Dismissed.

(60298) Department of Revenue v. Hartigan's Finer Foods, Inc. ..................................... Allowed.


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1984
101 Ill. 2d 563 (Ill. 1984)

holding that the devices described in the Act generally refer to contrivances on which a workman is dependent for support

Summary of this case from Seeden v. Metropolitan Sanitary District
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 1, 1984

Citations

101 Ill. 2d 563 (Ill. 1984)

Citing Cases

First Nat'l Leasing v. E.T.P. of Chicago

Ruzicka's motion to vacate the judgment and argument stated that he was entitled to relief under section…

Seeden v. Metropolitan Sanitary District

Plaintiff urges this court to follow Prange and Urman and to resolve the question as to whether the Act is…