From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dishaw v. Cent. N.Y. Regional Transp. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1992
179 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 31, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff's car was struck at an intersection in the City of Syracuse by a bus owned by defendant Central New York Regional Transportation Authority (Centro). She commenced this action against Centro and the City of Syracuse, alleging that the bus was negligently operated and that the stop sign at the intersection was obstructed by an untrimmed tree. The City thereafter moved for summary judgment on the ground that no prior notice of the allegedly obstructed stop sign was given, as required by section 8-115 of the City of Syracuse Charter. The court correctly denied the City's motion. The gravamen of plaintiff's complaint is that an untrimmed tree obstructed the stop sign, rendering the sign defective. The notice requirement does not apply to defective signs (see, Alexander v. Eldred, 63 N.Y.2d 460, 467; Tyner v. City of Buffalo, 152 A.D.2d 978; cf., Monteleone v. Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 N.Y.2d 917; Levine v. Sharon, 160 A.D.2d 840; Redmond v. Lomanto, 144 A.D.2d 448). Centro, a nonmoving, nonappealing party, argues for the first time on appeal that it is entitled to dismissal of the City's second affirmative defense concerning lack of prior notice. We decline to grant that relief.


Summaries of

Dishaw v. Cent. N.Y. Regional Transp. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1992
179 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Dishaw v. Cent. N.Y. Regional Transp. Auth

Case Details

Full title:COLLEEN DISHAW, Respondent, v. CENTRAL NEW YORK REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Torres v. Galvin

that Village Law § 6-628 did not apply in the circumstances herein. Contrary to the Village's assertion, we…

Beaumont v. Smyth

Local Law #3 does not speak of or address signage. Prior written notice statutes do not apply to defective…