From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diehl v. McCash

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Aug 22, 2008
08-cv-133=BBC (W.D. Wis. Aug. 22, 2008)

Opinion

08-cv-133=BBC.

August 22, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner Earl L. Diehl has filed objections to the report and recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge in which the magistrate judge recommended denial of petitioner's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because the magistrate judge explained thoroughly, persuasively and correctly why petitioner was not being held in custody in violation of the United States Constitution, I am adopting his report in all respects.

It is not necessary to add to the magistrate judge's explanation of the reasons why the petition must be denied. It is evident that petitioner does not agree with that explanation but equally evident that he has no legal basis for his objections.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on July 28, 2008, is ADOPTED. FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner Earl L. Diehl's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED for petitioner's failure to show that he is in custody in violation of the laws or constitution of the United States.


Summaries of

Diehl v. McCash

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Aug 22, 2008
08-cv-133=BBC (W.D. Wis. Aug. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Diehl v. McCash

Case Details

Full title:EARL L. DIEHL, Petitioner, v. MICKEY McCASH, Warden, Oregon Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Aug 22, 2008

Citations

08-cv-133=BBC (W.D. Wis. Aug. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

State v. Faulkner

Thus, "post-revocation sanctions, such as a sentence imposed following the revocation of supervised release…