Opinion
08-cv-133=BBC.
August 22, 2008
ORDER
Petitioner Earl L. Diehl has filed objections to the report and recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge in which the magistrate judge recommended denial of petitioner's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because the magistrate judge explained thoroughly, persuasively and correctly why petitioner was not being held in custody in violation of the United States Constitution, I am adopting his report in all respects.
It is not necessary to add to the magistrate judge's explanation of the reasons why the petition must be denied. It is evident that petitioner does not agree with that explanation but equally evident that he has no legal basis for his objections.