From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dayton Xenia Motorbus Co. v. Pub. Util

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 8, 1926
156 N.E. 141 (Ohio 1926)

Opinion

No. 19613

Decided June 8, 1926.

Public Utilities Commission — Motor transportation companies — Certificate authorized where existing transportation service adequate.

ERROR to the Public Utilities Commission.

Messrs. McMahon, Corwin, Landis Markham, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. C.C. Crabbe, attorney general, Mr. John W. Bricker, and Mr. D.H. Armstrong, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the order of the said Public Utilities Commission be, and the same is hereby, reversed. The court find that the order in question, in so far as it authorizes motor bus service between Xenia and Dayton, by way of Osborn, by practically through service and without conditions or restrictions, results in establishing a new line of transportation in competition with an existing transportation line furnishing reasonably adequate service and the same is in conflict with the principles announced by this court in the case of McLain v. Public Utilities Commission, 110 Ohio St. 1, 143 N.E. 381.

The case is remanded to the public utilities commission with direction to require the schedule of operation over the routes between Xenia and Osborn and between Osborn and Dayton to be so modified as to prevent the establishment of such practically through and continuous service in violation of the principles of the McLain case, supra. Order reversed and cause remanded.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dayton Xenia Motorbus Co. v. Pub. Util

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 8, 1926
156 N.E. 141 (Ohio 1926)
Case details for

Dayton Xenia Motorbus Co. v. Pub. Util

Case Details

Full title:THE DAYTON XENIA MOTORBUS CO. ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 8, 1926

Citations

156 N.E. 141 (Ohio 1926)
156 N.E. 141

Citing Cases

Transit, Inc. v. P.U.C.

It has frequently been held that it is incumbent upon an applicant for an original certificate of public…

Beiter Line v. P.U.C

It has been held that it is incumbent upon an applicant for an original certificate of public convenience and…