From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

David v. Interfaith Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2002
295 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-06342

Submitted February 20, 2002.

June 25, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated May 25, 2001, which denied her motion to restore the action.

Benedict P. Morelli Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (David S. Ratner and Steven C. November of counsel), for appellant.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion to restore is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.

It is now well established that CPLR 3404 should be reserved strictly for cases that have reached the trial calendar (see Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 A.D.2d 190, 199). Since the instant action was never placed on the trial calendar when it was marked "off" and subsequently dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, the Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion to "restore" (see Zanani v. Savad, 286 A.D.2d 386, 387; Murray v. Smith Corp., 286 A.D.2d 377; Miller v. Duffy, 284 A.D.2d 380; Georgetown Mews Owners Corp. v. Campus Assocs., 283 A.D.2d 608).

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

David v. Interfaith Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2002
295 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

David v. Interfaith Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE DAVID, etc., appellant, v. INTERFAITH MEDICAL CENTER, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 40

Citing Cases

Circle Intl. Group, Inc. v. Anikeyeva

The court finds corroboration for this in the very position of 3404 in the CPLR, where it is preceded by the…