From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Duffy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted November 21, 2000.

June 11, 2001

In an action for specific performance of an option to purchase a cooperative apartment, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated December 22, 1999, as denied that branch of their motion which was to restore the action.

Christopher J. Panny, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.

Alter Barbaro, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Stephen V. Barbaro of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SONDRA MILLER, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

When the plaintiffs failed to appear at a scheduled pretrial conference, the action was marked "off" and ultimately dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, inter alia, denied that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action. We reverse insofar as appealed from.

For the reasons stated in Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv. ( A.D.2d [2d Dept., May 14, 2001]), CPLR 3404 is not applicable because the action was not on the trial calendar. Thus, that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action is granted.


Summaries of

Miller v. Duffy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Miller v. Duffy

Case Details

Full title:MARION MILLER, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JIM DUFFY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 11, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

Miller v. Duffy

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further, ORDERED that, upon reargument, the decision and order…

London v. Iceland Inc.

The respondents' respective motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404 should have been denied…