From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 18, 1911
119 P. 205 (Okla. 1911)

Opinion

No. 1213

Opinion Filed November 18, 1911.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Where the plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Brewer, C.)

Error from District Court, Cherokee County; John H. Pitchford, Judge.

Action by J. D. Cox against Augustus L. Rogers and others. Judgment for plaintiff as to Augustus L. Rogers and in favor of the other defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

Kenneth S. Murchison, for plaintiff in error.

Ezzard Holtzendorff, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on November 12, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosetion. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 P. 205; Bender v. Bender et al., infra, 119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Cox v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 18, 1911
119 P. 205 (Okla. 1911)
Case details for

Cox v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:COX v. ROGERS et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 18, 1911

Citations

119 P. 205 (Okla. 1911)
119 P. 205

Citing Cases

Snow v. Frye

The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of…

Simmer v. Gray

An examination of the record shows that the plaintiffs in error are in default in failing to file briefs,…