From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corrieri v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-10-2016

In the Matter of Carmine CORRIERI, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Carmine Corrieri, Gowanda, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Carmine Corrieri, Gowanda, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to that relief (see Matter of Marcial v. Fischer, 96 A.D.3d 1245, 1246, 946 N.Y.S.2d 708 [2012] ). He is, however, entitled to have restored the loss of good time incurred as a result of the disciplinary determination (see Matter of Moreno v. Prack, 130 A.D.3d 1121, 1122, 10 N.Y.S.3d 916 [2015] ; Matter of Marcial v. Fischer, 96 A.D.3d at 1246, 946 N.Y.S.2d 708 ). Otherwise, as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the proceeding is dismissed as moot (see Matter of McCaskell v. Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 128 A.D.3d 1208, 1208–1209, 8 N.Y.S.3d 498 [2015] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., EGAN JR., DEVINE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Corrieri v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Corrieri v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Carmine CORRIERI, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
137 A.D.3d 1407
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1734

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Annucci

In view of this, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Robinson v Prack, 137 AD3d 1452, 1452…

Zoccoli v. Annucci

In view of this, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Roye v Annucci, 137 AD3d 1392, 1393…