From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mccaskell v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 14, 2015
128 A.D.3d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

519629

2015-05-14

In the Matter of Brad McCASKELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.



Brad McCaskell, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. The record establishes that the penalty imposed included loss of good time and, although not referenced in the Attorney General's letter, “we note that any loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored” ( Matter of Hayes v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d 992, 992, 994 N.Y.S.2d 552 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted] ). In view of this, and given that petitioner has otherwise received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Ramos v. Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 A.D.3d 1215, 1216, 995 N.Y.S.2d 866 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Mccaskell v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 14, 2015
128 A.D.3d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Mccaskell v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BRAD McCASKELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 14, 2015

Citations

128 A.D.3d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
128 A.D.3d 1208
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 4187

Citing Cases

Streeter v. Annucci (In re Streeter)

Despite his request for additional relief, petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status that he…

Proctor v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…