Opinion
C.A. No. N18A-09-005 RRC
12-04-2018
Caesar Kasamba Cooper 5580 Heritage Court Drive, Apt. 1C Wilmington, Delaware 19808 Appellant, Pro se Karen M. Volker, Esquire Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 North French Street, 6th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Attorney for Appellee
RICHARD R. COOCH RESIDENT JUDGE Caesar Kasamba Cooper
5580 Heritage Court Drive, Apt. 1C
Wilmington, Delaware 19808
Appellant, Pro se Karen M. Volker, Esquire
Deputy Attorney General
Department of Justice
820 North French Street, 6th Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Attorney for Appellee On Appellee's Motion to Dismiss. GRANTED. Dear Mr. Cooper and Ms. Volker:
Appellee Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Long Term Care Residents Protection ("DHSS" and "DLTCRP" respectively) filed a Motion to Dismiss Appellant Caesar Kasamba Cooper's Appeal of the Decision of the Hearing Officer on behalf of DLTCRP. Pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 8564(b), the finding of the hearing officer is the final decision of DLTCRP, and is appealable on the record to the Superior Court. Under Superior Court Civil Rule 72(b), "[i]f no time is prescribed by statute, the notice of appeal shall be filed within 15 days from entry of the final judgment, order, or disposition from which an appeal is permitted by law." Section 8564 does not prescribe a deadline for filing an appeal. Thus, in this matter, Civil Rule 72(b) applies.
Super. Ct. Civ. R. 72(b).
Appellant was advised that Civil Rule 72(b) applied to his matter under Section V of the hearing officer's written decision. See Final Decision of the Division of Long Term Care Residents Protection, Appellee's Mot. to Dismiss, Ex. B, Trans. ID 62593786, at 11, § V.
It is well established that the Court lacks jurisdiction to decide a direct appeal that is untimely, and jurisdictional defects cannot be waived. There is no remedy for an untimely appeal, as the Court lacks jurisdiction. Under Superior Court Civil Rule 72(i), the Court has discretion to dismiss any appeal sua sponte, or on a motion to dismiss by any party. Among other reasons, "[d]ismissal may be ordered for untimely filing of an appeal...."
Eller v. State, 531 A.2d 951, 953 (Del. 1987).
Eller, 531 A.2d at 951; Irvin-Wright v. State, 2003 WL 21481004, at *3 (Del. Super. June 16, 2003).
Super. Ct. Civ. R. 72(i).
Id. --------
In this case, Appellant filed his appeal five days after the 15-day deadline. The hearing officer, on behalf of DLTCRP, rendered a final decision on August 31, 2018. Thus, Appellant was required to file a notice of appeal on or before September 15, 2018, or risk waiving any right to further appeal. Appellant filed his appeal on September 20, 2018. Appellant's appeal must be dismissed.
Accordingly, Appellee's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Very truly yours,
/s/ RRC cc: Prothonotary
Department of Health and Social Services
Division of Long Term Care Residents Protection