affirming conviction where Commonwealth's expert testified that the supernatant testing method used in that case was equivalent to the gas chromatography method used to test whole blood such that a conversion factor was "useless," or that "essentially, a one-to-one ratio" was appropriate
Summary of this case from Boslet v. RichmondNO. 1260 MDA 2012
2013-07-12
Com. v. D. Phillips
Appeal From: CP–18–CR–0000301–2011 (Clinton)
Disposition: Affirmed.
affirming conviction where Commonwealth's expert testified that the supernatant testing method used in that case was equivalent to the gas chromatography method used to test whole blood such that a conversion factor was "useless," or that "essentially, a one-to-one ratio" was appropriate
Summary of this case from Boslet v. RichmondFull title:Com. v. D. Phillips
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: Jul 12, 2013
requiring a conversion factor were not binding as they did not address the 2004 changes to the DUI statute,…