Summary
In Clay, the defendant received an enhanced sentence based on a felony conviction that was subsequently reclassified. He argued that "because his prior felony was retroactively erased, his sentence violates § 841(b)(1), his right to due process of law, and the Eighth Amendment" (ECF No. 42 at 4).
Summary of this case from United States v. MunaycoOpinion
No. LA CV 17-05720-VBF
05-14-2018
FINAL JUDGMENT
Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of petitioner on the Due Process and Eighth Amendment claims for a writ of habeas corpus directing that he be resentenced.
IT IS SO ADJUDGED. Dated: May 14, 2018
/s/_________
Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank
Senior United States District Judge