From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
May 14, 2018
No. LA CV 17-05720-VBF (C.D. Cal. May. 14, 2018)

Summary

In Clay, the defendant received an enhanced sentence based on a felony conviction that was subsequently reclassified. He argued that "because his prior felony was retroactively erased, his sentence violates § 841(b)(1), his right to due process of law, and the Eighth Amendment" (ECF No. 42 at 4).

Summary of this case from United States v. Munayco

Opinion

No. LA CV 17-05720-VBF

05-14-2018

LORENZO CLAY II, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


FINAL JUDGMENT

Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of petitioner on the Due Process and Eighth Amendment claims for a writ of habeas corpus directing that he be resentenced.

IT IS SO ADJUDGED. Dated: May 14, 2018

/s/_________

Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Clay v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
May 14, 2018
No. LA CV 17-05720-VBF (C.D. Cal. May. 14, 2018)

In Clay, the defendant received an enhanced sentence based on a felony conviction that was subsequently reclassified. He argued that "because his prior felony was retroactively erased, his sentence violates § 841(b)(1), his right to due process of law, and the Eighth Amendment" (ECF No. 42 at 4).

Summary of this case from United States v. Munayco
Case details for

Clay v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO CLAY II, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 14, 2018

Citations

No. LA CV 17-05720-VBF (C.D. Cal. May. 14, 2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Munayco

He makes no independent argument, but relies on a case from the United States District Court for the Central…