From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Churchman v. Payte

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 19, 1913
133 P. 178 (Okla. 1913)

Opinion

No. 2755

Opinion Filed June 19, 1913.

JUSTICES OF THE PEACE — Appeal Bond — Defects — Amendment. Where the bond given on appeal from justice court to county court is in proper form in all respects, and contains all the statutory conditions, except the condition to "prosecute the appeal to effect and without unnecessary delay," it is error to refuse leave to correct error by filing a new bond containing the omitted condition.

(Syllabus by Rosser, C.)

Error from County Court, Coal County; R. H. Wells, Judge.

Action by S. G. Payte against Tom Churchman. From a judgment of the county court, dismissing an appeal from a justice of the peace, plaintiff brings error. Reversed and remanded.

C. M. Threadgill, for plaintiff in error.

Trice Moore, for defendant in error.


This appeal is from an order of the county court dismissing an appeal on account of a defect in the appeal bond.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as the facts in the case of Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff, 34 Okla. 309, 125 P. 727. It was there held that it was the duty of the court to permit an appeal bond to be corrected or amended as provided in section 5394, Comp. Laws 1909. That case has been followed in C., R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Moore, 34 Okla. 199, 124 P. 898; Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter, 34 Okla. 313, 125 P. 729, and Roberts v. Converse, ante, 131 P. 539.

This case must be reversed and remanded, with instructions to the county court of Coal county to permit the plaintiff in error to file an amended appeal bond, and to proceed with the trial of the case in regular course.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Churchman v. Payte

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 19, 1913
133 P. 178 (Okla. 1913)
Case details for

Churchman v. Payte

Case Details

Full title:CHURCHMAN v. PAYTE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 19, 1913

Citations

133 P. 178 (Okla. 1913)
133 P. 178

Citing Cases

Wilken et al. v. Gevers

An examination of section 6387, Comp. Laws 1909, shows it was not necessary to name in the appeal bond the…

Miller v. Shelton

The giving of this notice required by statute is like the signing and settling of a case-made upon appeal,…