From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 18, 1912
125 P. 729 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 2054

Opinion Filed July 18, 1912.

FORMER DECISION FOLLOWED. The syllabus in this case is the same as the syllabus in Spaulding Manufacturing Co. v. Roff, ante, 125 P. 727.

(Syllabus by Rosser, C.)

Error from Coal County Court; R. H. Wells, Judge.

Action by the Spaulding Manufacturing Company against C. M. Witter, D. A. Wooly, and J. C. Thomas. From a judgment refusing to permit plaintiff to amend his petition, and refusing to permit him to amend an appeal bond and dismissing appeal, plaintiff brings error. Reversed and remanded.

G. T. Ralls, for plaintiff in error.

Fooshee Brunson, for defendants in error.


The record in this case is, in all respects, identical with the record in Spaulding Manufacturing Co. v. Roff et al., ante, 125 P. 727, by Brewer, C., except as to the name of the defendants. Upon the authority of that case, this case must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings, not inconsistent with the opinion in that case.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 18, 1912
125 P. 729 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter

Case Details

Full title:SPAULDING MFG. CO. v. WITTER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 18, 1912

Citations

125 P. 729 (Okla. 1912)
125 P. 729

Citing Cases

Sadler v. Leach

"Where a bond given on appeal from justice court is correct in every respect, except that the statutory words…

Roberts v. Converse

The facts of this case are almost identical with the facts in the case of Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff, 34…