From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 20, 2001
531 U.S. 1159 (2001)

Summary

barring appeal is too harsh a sanction "in the absence of any showing that the fugitive status has impaired the rights of the other [party]"

Summary of this case from L.F. v. L.J

Opinion

FEBRUARY 20, 2001


00-7318. HANSEN v. BARKER, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1277.

00-7329. SEDGWICK v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 430.

00-7332. LANDA TAPIA v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-7336. WILLIAMS v. MCCORD. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1146.

00-7337. WILSON v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

00-7338. WRIGHT v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7340. WEEKS v. MISSOURI. Sup.Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.

00-7343. WALSH v. WALSH ET AL.; and

00-7623. WALSH v. WALSH. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 204.

00-7344. LAY v. LITSCHER. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7345. MALLETT v. LUEBBERS, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7346. THORNTON v. ROE, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7347. YOUNG v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 372.

00-7349. NEGRON v. ADAMS ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1164.

00-7352. MEEKS v. MOORE, SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 951.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 20, 2001
531 U.S. 1159 (2001)

barring appeal is too harsh a sanction "in the absence of any showing that the fugitive status has impaired the rights of the other [party]"

Summary of this case from L.F. v. L.J

barring appeal is too harsh a sanction "in the absence of any showing that the fugitive status has impaired the rights of the other [party]"

Summary of this case from Yousif v. Yousif
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1159 (2001)

Citing Cases

Ahmed v. Oak Mgmt. Corp.

("Fugitive disentitlement cases arise in three distinct procedural postures: [1] criminal and civil appeals…

Yousif v. Yousif

See Matsumoto v. Matsumoto, 171 N.J. 110, 128 (2002) (fugitive disentitlement doctrine is appropriate "so…