From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campione v. Rose Hill Property Assoc., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1995
216 A.D.2d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 20, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.).


The language of the Loan Agreement is plain and unambiguous, and contained no conditions to excuse repayment or reference to the Option Agreement, and thus the court properly granted defendants partial summary judgment based on plaintiff's default in repayment of the loan principal.

The court also properly denied plaintiff partial summary judgment on his claim to enforce purchase of his shares of defendant corporation under the Option Agreement based on the existence of questions of fact as to the definition of the term "material portion" of the corporation's assets, the mortgaging of which would trigger the option, as well as the value of the subject property.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Campione v. Rose Hill Property Assoc., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1995
216 A.D.2d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Campione v. Rose Hill Property Assoc., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN CAMPIONE, Appellant, v. ROSE HILL PROPERTY ASSOC., INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 640

Citing Cases

Healthcare Capital Management, LLC v. Abrams

A stay of the enforcement of a judgment granted for attorneys' fees due is appropriate where a pending claim…

Com Serv. of Perry, Inc. v. Perm. Foliage

"When the language of a loan agreement is plain and unambiguous", a court may grant summary judgment based on…