From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 27, 2008
49 A.D.3d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503193.

March 27, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Ricky Butler, Buffalo, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Rose, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ.


During a search of petitioner's prison cell, a correction officer discovered a broken razor with a missing blade, which blade had been removed and hidden inside some paperwork. As a consequence, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with altering state property, possessing an altered item and destroying state property. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all three charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who performed the cell search and authored the report, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Davis v Goord, 34 AD3d 1027, 1027). Petitioner's exculpatory statements, including his claim that he accidentally broke the razor by stepping on it, presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Vigliotti v Selsky, 45 AD3d 946, 946-947). Regarding deficiencies in the hearing transcript, they are not so significant as to preclude meaningful review by this Court ( see Matter of Lewis v Goord, 43 AD3d 1223, 1224). Finally, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer failed to assess his mental health status is unpreserved for our review given petitioner's failure to raise it at the disciplinary hearing ( see Matter of Spirles v Goord, 308 AD2d 610, 611).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Butler v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 27, 2008
49 A.D.3d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Butler v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICKY BUTLER, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 27, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2728
853 N.Y.S.2d 709

Citing Cases

Wigfall v. Goord

Any conflicts that could be construed in the hearing testimony presented credibility issues for resolution by…

Pedraza v. Fischer

While petitioner maintained that he was "set up" by correction officers, and many of his inmate witnesses…