From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 13, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502050.

September 13, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Marc Lewis, Wilton, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of refusing a direct order, refusing frisk procedures and violent conduct. Following affirmance on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of guilt.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and hearing testimony constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt ( see Matter of Odom v Selsky, 37 AD3d 923, 924). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, nothing in the record demonstrates that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Nieves v Goord, 39 AD3d 1104, 1105). As for the deficiencies in the hearing transcript, they are not so significant as to prevent meaningful judicial review ( see Matter of Frazier v Artus, 40 AD3d 1288, 1289). To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 13, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Lewis v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARC LEWIS, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 13, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6603
842 N.Y.S.2d 105

Citing Cases

William v. Donald

That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78…

Pressley v. Annucci

See Hamid v. Goord, 25 AD3d 1041; see also Maya v. Goord, 272 AD2d 724. Although the petitioner repeatedly…