From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birch v. Lampert

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 10, 2002
49 P.3d 114 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

00-05-250M; A112189

Argued and submitted May 31, 2002.

Filed: July 10, 2002

Appeal from Circuit Court, Malheur County. F. J. Yraguen, Judge.

Bob Pangburn argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and TIKTIN, Judge pro tempore.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus and the entry of a judgment for reimbursement of $525 in state-paid attorney fees related to the petition. We reject his arguments on the merits without discussion. Petitioner's only argument at the trial court concerning the judgment for attorney fees was that courts did not award such fees in 1989, the time of his conviction. He does not make that argument on appeal. None of the arguments that he does make constitutes error apparent on the face of the record, and we therefore decline to review them. Cf. Bacote v. Johnson , 333 Or. 28, 31-32, 35 P.3d 1019 (2001) (objection that court had failed even to make an inquiry as to petitioner's ability to pay was sufficient to preserve the issue of ability to pay for appeal).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Birch v. Lampert

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 10, 2002
49 P.3d 114 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Birch v. Lampert

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN BIRCH, Appellant, v. ROBERT LAMPERT, Superintendent, Snake River…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 10, 2002

Citations

49 P.3d 114 (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
49 P.3d 114

Citing Cases

Birch v. Santos

The Oregon Court of Appeals issued a written opinion addressing only the issue of attorney fees, and the…