From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beltran v. Borstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 14, 1969
32 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

July 14, 1969


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 16, 1968, which denied his motion for a special preference pursuant to CPLR 3403. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements jointly against respondents filing separate briefs; motion for special preference granted; and case remanded to Special Term for entry of an appropriate implementing order. Plaintiff, as a result of injuries suffered in the accident in question, has been unable to work since the accident and has become a recipient of welfare from the City of New York. The application for a special preference should have been granted ( Quinones v. Hunchak, 28 A.D.2d 997; Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corp., 262 App. Div. 872). Rabin, Acting P.J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beltran v. Borstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 14, 1969
32 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Beltran v. Borstein

Case Details

Full title:WILFREDO BELTRAN, Appellant, v. NAT BORSTEIN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
303 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Bellair Laser Ctr., Inc.

at movant's current physical condition renders it impossible to obtain gainful employment], with Roman…

Sabater v. New York City Transit Authority

In such circumstance plaintiff's application for a special preference should have been granted. ( Beltran v.…