Summary
In Moss, the Court of Appeals stated only that, "[a]s conceded by the People, no basis in law exists for... [the] conclusion that an automatic override increased [the] defendant's presumptive risk level two designation to risk level three" (id. at 1095, 982 N.Y.S.2d 55, 5 N.E.3d 26).
Summary of this case from People v. EdmondsOpinion
2014-02-13
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Dwight MOSS, Appellant.
Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (James Eckert of counsel), for appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of counsel), for respondent.
Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (James Eckert of counsel), for appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Both Supreme Court and the Appellate Division (107 A.D.3d 1574, 966 N.Y.S.2d 711 [2013] ) failed to articulate a proper legal basis for adjudicating the defendant a risk level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). As conceded by the People, no basis in law exists for Supreme Court's or the Appellate Division's conclusion that an automatic override increased defendant's presumptive risk level two designation to risk level three ( see Sex Offender Registration Act Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3–4 [2006] ). Both of the courts below having erred in concluding defendant is a presumptive risk level three offender, we remit to Supreme Court for further proceedings. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, and case remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.