From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beauchamp v. Lucander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1999
257 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 21, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).


Transfer to Supreme Court was properly denied because at the time the motion therefor was made, a stipulation discontinuing the action was in effect, and thus there was no action pending within the meaning of CPLR 325 (b) to be transferred ( cf., Anderson v. Monticup, 124 A.D.2d 320). In any event, the proposed amended complaint fails to allege facts that, if true, indicate damages beyond the jurisdiction of the Civil Court ( see, Matter of Victor v. de Maziroff, 275 App. Div. 69, affd 300 N.Y. 686).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Tom and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Beauchamp v. Lucander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1999
257 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Beauchamp v. Lucander

Case Details

Full title:VALDIVIA BEAUCHAMP, Appellant, v. HENRY LUCANDER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
684 N.Y.S.2d 217

Citing Cases

Cooper v. Town of Islip

The Court finds that removal of the District Court action to the Supreme Court is not warranted herein. An…