From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aymes v. Tax Comm'n of the City of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2012
95 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-10

In re Clifford AYMES, Petitioner–Appellant, v. The TAX COMMISSION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents–Respondents.

Clifford Aymes, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Andrea M. Chan of counsel), for respondents.


Clifford Aymes, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Andrea M. Chan of counsel), for respondents.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, CATTERSON, ACOSTA, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered April 28, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition, and dismissed this proceeding brought pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As a prerequisite to commencing a proceeding under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review an assessment of real property, petitioner was required to “show that a complaint was made in due time to the proper officers to correct such assessment” (RPTL 706[2] ). The court correctly held that the “proper officer” in this case was respondent Tax Commission, as section 153(b) of the New York City Charter states that the Tax Commission “shall be charged with the duty of reviewing and correcting all assessments of real property” ( see also N.Y. City Charter § 163[f]; Matter of G.A.D. Holding Co. v. City of N.Y. Dept. of Fin., Real Prop. Assessment Bur., 192 A.D.2d 441, 442, 596 N.Y.S.2d 799 [1993] ). Given petitioner's failure to timely file a complaint with the Tax Commission, the petition was properly dismissed ( Matter of Sterling Estates v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 66 N.Y.2d 122, 126, 495 N.Y.S.2d 328, 485 N.E.2d 993 [1985] ). We note, however, that dismissal of this proceeding for failure to exhaust administrative remedies does not, in and of itself, bar petitioner from seeking corrections relating to the subject property's square footage, income, and expenses, which he properly sought in a Request for Review filed with the Department of Finance.


Summaries of

Aymes v. Tax Comm'n of the City of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2012
95 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Aymes v. Tax Comm'n of the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In re Clifford AYMES, Petitioner–Appellant, v. The TAX COMMISSION OF the…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
95 A.D.3d 567
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3727

Citing Cases

Better World Real Estate Grp. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Fin.

If the respondents are correct in their assertion that the petitioner's sole method of challenging the…

Aymes v.the Tax Comm'n of N.Y.

On April 27, 2011, this court granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition based on petitioner's…