From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdic v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Dec 19, 2018
926 N.W.2d 787 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

concluding that even if there were a change in the law based on a new supreme court opinion, the change occurred when the applicant had over two years to raise the claim before the statute of limitations ran

Summary of this case from Penticoff v. State

Opinion

No. 18-0321

12-19-2018

Zejnudin ABDIC, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Christine E. Branstad of Branstad & Olson Law Office, Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Zejnudin Abdic appeals the summary dismissal of his application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Abdic v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Dec 19, 2018
926 N.W.2d 787 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

concluding that even if there were a change in the law based on a new supreme court opinion, the change occurred when the applicant had over two years to raise the claim before the statute of limitations ran

Summary of this case from Penticoff v. State
Case details for

Abdic v. State

Case Details

Full title:ZEJNUDIN ABDIC, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Dec 19, 2018

Citations

926 N.W.2d 787 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Poole v. State

And our cases plainly hold that "nothing prevents the trial court from reviewing the summary judgment motion…

Penticoff v. State

See Nguyen, 829 N.W.2d at 188 (implying that a PCR filed outside the statute of limitations but within three…