0520120441
09-20-2012
Ronald Hodges, Complainant, v. Sheila C. Bair, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.
Ronald Hodges,
Complainant,
v.
Sheila C. Bair,
Chairman,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Agency.
Request No. 0520120441
Appeal No. 0120121333
Agency No. FDICEO11069
DENIAL
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Ronald Hodges v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121333 (May 9, 2012). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121333 remains the Commission's decision.1 There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
___9/20/12_______________
Date
1 We remind Complainant that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17. A reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Here, we find no evidence that Complainant has met the criteria for reconsideration. Complainant did not challenge any specific aspect of the previous decision which found that his complaint was properly dismissed because he filed a grievance on the same matter. For the most part, Complainant merely set forth his contention that a decision was issued before, he claims, he was provided the information which supported the Agency's initial dismissal. Although this contention is disputed by the Agency, we note that there is no dispute that Complainant had the information before the previous decision was issued and that, even in his request, he does not provide a specific objection to the grounds provided by the Agency for dismissing his complaint. He does, however, speculate that a different result might have been reached had he "timely" received the materials.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0520120441
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013