In the Matter of Cintron

Board of Immigration AppealsSep 3, 1976
16 I&N Dec. 9 (B.I.A. 1976)

Cases citing this document

How cited

  • Khachatryan v. Blinken

    Although the INS decision acknowledged the agency's receipt of the withdrawal notice, the decision expressly…

  • El Mokhamad v. Kelly

    Consequently, Defendants have neither denied nor approved an I-130 petition filed by Plaintiffs. A denial of…

2 Citing cases

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • holding that a petition which has been withdrawn cannot be considered denied

    Summary of this case from El Mokhamad v. Kelly

A-20583637

Decided by Board September 3, 1976.

The United States citizen petitioner submitted a letter to the District Director requesting that the visa petition filed to accord his spouse immediate relative classification be withdrawn. The letter request was acknowledged by the District Director, but he subsequently ordered the petition denied. In view of the petitioner's letter request that the petition be withdrawn, the denial by the District Director was erroneous, and it is the order of the Board that the record reflect that the petition was withdrawn by petitioner.

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Fried, Fragomen Del Rey, P.C. 515 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022


The United States citizen petitioner filed a visa petition in behalf of the beneficiary as his spouse under section 201(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. He subsequently submitted a letter withdrawing the petition. In a decision dated October 9, 1975, the District Director acknowledged having received the letter withdrawing the petition but nevertheless ordered the petition be denied. The petitioner has appealed from the District Director's decision refusing to consider the petition withdrawn. The appeal will be sustained.

Just as any United States citizen or lawful permanent resident may file a visa petition in behalf of an alien, so may he withdraw the petition before a decision has been rendered. The action of the District Director in refusing to consider the petition withdrawn was erroneous. Accordingly, we shall sustain the appeal and order the record to reflect that the petition has been withdrawn.

ORDER: The appeal is sustained; the visa petition filed by the petitioner in behalf of the beneficiary has been withdrawn.