Brenda Allen, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 25, 2008
0120082810 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 25, 2008)

0120082810

08-25-2008

Brenda Allen, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Brenda Allen,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082810

Agency No. 4F-900-0276-08

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

final decision dated May 30, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

On May 22, 2008, complainant filed a formal EEO complaint. Therein,

complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the

bases of disability and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity.

In its final decision dated May 30, 2008, the agency determined that

complainant's complaint was comprised of the following claims:

1) complainant was presented with a job offer that did not include her

most recent restrictions and was subsequently threatened by management;

and

2) complainant was denied a union representative during a meeting with

her.

The agency dismissed claim (1) for failure to state a claim.

Specifically, the agency stated that "[c]omplainant does not state and the

file is devoid of complainant [sic] being forced to work outside of her

medical restrictions, being forced to sign the job offer in question, or

of suffering any other adverse action." The agency also dismissed claim

(2) for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the agency stated that

"[c]omplainant's claim of not being afforded union representation is a

collateral attack and not properly before the Commission."

On appeal, complainant, through her attorney, asserts that the agency's

dismissal of her complaint is improper. Specifically, complainant's

attorney states that when complainant refused to sign the job offer at

issue, a named agency manager did not provide her with work and that

complainant lost time from work. In addition, complainant's attorney

asserts that complainant has received daily orders from her supervisor

to perform work outside of her restrictions.

The Commission finds that the agency improperly dismissed claim (1)

for failure to state a claim. The only questions for an agency to

consider in determining whether a complaint states a claim are: (1)

whether complainant is an aggrieved employee; and (2) whether complainant

raises employment discrimination on a basis covered by EEO statutes.

If these questions are answered in the affirmative, an agency must accept

the complaint for processing regardless of its judgment of the merits.

See Odoski v. Department of Energy, EEOC Appeal No. 01901496 (April 16,

1990). Upon review of the record, including complainant's statement

on appeal, we find that complainant is alleging that she was denied a

reasonable accommodation based on her protected classes; thus, she has

stated a cognizable claim.

The Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed claim (2).

The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint

process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See Wills

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998);

Kleinman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940585

(September 22, 1994); Lingad v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). The proper forum for complainant

to raise her claim that she was denied a union representative is within

the negotiated grievance process.

Accordingly, we REVERSE the agency's final decision dismissing claim

(1) and we REMAND this matter to the agency for further processing in

accordance with the Order below. However, we AFFIRM the agency's final

decision dismissing claim (2).

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0408)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 25, 2008

Date

2

0120082810

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120082810