From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Young

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1994
640 N.E.2d 839 (Ohio 1994)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

reversing the appellate court on the authority of Cramer, and reinstating the trial court's finding of contempt based on the failure to pay a lump sum judgment and continuing support obligations, all of which were referred to as “child support”

Summary of this case from Seaman v. Sloan
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. 94-1220

Submitted September 13, 1994 —

Decided November 9, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Miami County, No. 93-CA-10.

Gretchen K. Beers and Ann Ratcliff, Miami County Child Support Enforcement Agency, for appellant.

Louie R. Kindell Associates and Louie R. Kindell, for appellee.

The discretionary appeal is allowed; the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the judgment of the court of common pleas is reinstated on the authority of Cramer v. Petrie (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 131, 637 N.E.2d 882.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Young v. Young

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1994
640 N.E.2d 839 (Ohio 1994)

reversing the appellate court on the authority of Cramer, and reinstating the trial court's finding of contempt based on the failure to pay a lump sum judgment and continuing support obligations, all of which were referred to as “child support”

Summary of this case from Seaman v. Sloan

In Young, the Ohio Supreme Court determined that a contempt order entered after children are emancipated does not violate Article I, Section 15 of the Ohio Constitution. Young, 70 Ohio St.3d 679. See, also, Robinson, 1996 WL 502141.

Summary of this case from Sizemore v. Sizemore
Case details for

Young v. Young

Case Details

Full title:YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. YOUNG, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 9, 1994

Citations

640 N.E.2d 839 (Ohio 1994)
640 N.E.2d 839

Citing Cases

Sizemore v. Sizemore

Specifically, WCCSEA argues that domestic support obligations are not "debts" within the purview of the Ohio…

Pappas v. Basile (In re Contempt of Pappas)

Cramer did not, however, involve the issue of a lump sum judgment and the obligor was under a continuing…

7 Citing Cases